Skip to content
DDelTech MUNDocs

Scoring and the rubric

How criteria are weighted, why scores are comparable, and what a recommendation means.

Scoring is per criterion, weighted, and reported on a single comparable scale.

Submitting an evaluation

You give a score for every criterion in the rubric, written remarks of up to four thousand characters, and one recommendation: select, hold or reject.

The form rejects an evaluation that has an unknown criterion, is missing a criterion, or has a score outside a criterion's range. You cannot half-submit.

How the number is produced

  1. Each criterion's score is normalised to a 0 to 1 range against its own maximum.

  2. Each normalised score is multiplied by its weight.

  3. The weighted values are combined and reported on a 0 to 10 scale.

The normalisation step is the one worth understanding. It means a criterion scored out of 5 and one scored out of 100 contribute according to their weights, not according to their maxima. Without it, any criterion with a bigger scale would quietly dominate.

Recommendations and the panel verdict

Each evaluator recommends independently. The panel's verdict is resolved from all of them:

  • a clear majority wins;
  • any tie becomes HOLD.

A tie never resolves in either direction by accident. If the panel is split, the candidate is held for a human to look at.

Revising an evaluation

Evaluations are append-only. Revising does not overwrite the previous version; it adds a new one that supersedes it. The whole chain stays visible in the dossier.

Voiding an evaluation is Administrative Council only.

Who can see whose scores

By default you see your own evaluations. Seeing other evaluators' scores is a separate capability, held by Senior and Administrative Council.

This is deliberate: it stops evaluators anchoring on each other's numbers before they have formed their own view.

Writing scores that are worth having

  • Use the whole scale. A rubric where everyone scores 7 to 9 carries no information.
  • Score the criterion, not the candidate. Someone can be excellent on content and weak on courtesy; that is what a rubric is for.
  • The remarks matter more than the number. At finalisation, the Administrative Council reads remarks. A score of 6.4 with no remarks tells them nothing they can act on.
  • Submit before you leave the room. Written an hour later, remarks are worse.